Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Concise ‘Ilm's avatar

Great piece. An incredibly great piece. Thank you very much.

To add, however, I think there's a depth beyond this fog lifting—and it doesn't dissolve, even when you see clearly. I'm talking about when the spell breaks and you still choose them. And it usually isn't even things to be because they're extraordinary, but because the ordinariness itself becomes sacred. You see their flaws, their repetitions, the unglamorous mechanics of who they are, and you love them anyway. You love them regardless. Not less—differently. This is what marriages wade into.

The infatuation fades, yes, but something sturdier can take root if you let it. And when you look at it closely, you realize it's not passion that sustains it. It's often more a thing of decision. The choice to keep building with someone even after the mystery is gone. Sometimes that fades too. Sometimes you realize you were only ever in love with the idea, and when clarity comes, there's nothing left to anchor to. But other times, you find that loving someone ordinary, consistently, with eyes wide open, is its own kind of spell. Quieter. Harder. More real. Both are inescapable—whether you stay or leave, you're making peace with the fact that no one is that special, and that includes you.

Health over Tea.'s avatar

This is such a beautiful read.

I love love how to brought psychology into explaining one-sided love and infatuation.

This is a piece I'd read over and over again and still learn something new.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?