No One's Ever That Special
Fatima had a notebook.
Not a journal exactly, more like a record. She'd been keeping it for eight months without meaning to, writing down every interaction she had with Tariq. The time he held the door open for her at the library. The way he laughed during their group study session, his head tilting back slightly, eyes closing for a split second. The afternoon he wore that particular shade of blue that made his skin glow under the lecture hall lights. The time their fingers almost touched reaching for the same textbook.
Almost.
She filled fourteen pages with almost.
This is what unrequited love actually looks like. Not the cinematic version where you pine beautifully from a distance and eventually the person notices you and everything falls into place. It looks like this. A notebook full of moments that meant nothing to one person and everything to another. A girl cataloguing evidence of a connection that exists entirely in her own mind, building a case for something that was never there.
Tariq didn't know Fatima was in love with him. He barely knew she existed outside of the lectures they shared. She was just another face in his peripheral vision, someone whose name he'd learned to associate with the study group, someone he was polite to the way you're polite to people whose last name you can pronounce.
And Fatima knew this. Somewhere beneath all the hope and the longing and the careful observation, she knew. But knowing something intellectually and feeling it are two completely different things, and her feelings were so loud they drowned out everything else.
In 2005, anthropologist Helen Fisher placed people who described themselves as being in love inside MRI machines. Not people in stable relationships. People in the obsessive, consuming early stages of infatuation, the kind that feels like your chest is physically caving in.
The results were striking. The regions that lit up were the same ones that activate in cocaine addicts experiencing cravings. The ventral tegmental area. The caudate nucleus. The parts of your brain responsible for reward-seeking, for fixation, for the kind of laser-focused attention that makes you scan every room for one specific face.
Fisher's conclusion was blunt: love, at least in its early stages, isn't an emotion in the way we think of it. It's a drive. A biological mechanism designed to make you pursue one person with single-minded intensity, flooding your system with dopamine until that person becomes the only thing that matters.
The critical detail Fisher emphasized was this: the mechanism doesn't evaluate whether the person deserves that intensity before activating. It doesn't check whether they feel the same way. It simply selects a target and fires.
So the extraordinary feeling you have when you think about someone? That feeling of electricity, of significance, of the universe conspiring to bring you together? That's not a signal that they're special. That's your dopamine system doing its job, which is to make you obsessed with someone long enough to pursue them. Nothing more.
Fatima understood none of this while it was happening. All she understood was that when Tariq walked into a room, something in her chest physically moved..like tectonic plates shifting. That when he spoke to her directly, even about something mundane like borrowing a pen, her hands would shake slightly afterward. That she'd check his Instagram story seventeen times a day not because she expected anything there but because seeing his face, even through a screen, provided temporary relief from the ache.
This is what psychologists call limerence. A state of intense, obsessive, one-sided infatuation that can last anywhere from months to years. Dr. Dorothy Tennov, who first described the phenomenon in detail, noted that people experiencing limerence often describe it as involuntary, as if their mind has been hijacked by something they didn't choose and can't control.
And that's exactly how Fatima described it to her roommate one night, crying over nothing specific, just the burden of wanting someone who didn't want her back. "I didn't ask for this," she said. "I don't even like the version of myself that does this. But I can't stop."
She couldn't stop because her brain wouldn't let her.
In 1966, psychologists conducted what became known as the suspension bridge experiment. They stationed an attractive woman at the end of two different bridges, one stable and safe, one rickety and terrifying, swaying over a canyon. She asked men crossing each bridge to fill out a survey. The men on the frightening bridge were significantly more likely to call her afterward, not because she was more attractive there, but because their brains took the adrenaline produced by fear and misidentified it as attraction.
The lesson was uncomfortable: your body can't always distinguish between fear and desire. Between anxiety and chemistry. Between the arousal of danger and the arousal of wanting someone.
Fatima was a living proof of this. She met Tariq during one of the most stressful periods of her life, deep into her fifth year of school, exhausted and lonely and terrified of the future. Her nervous system was already running hot. And then this person appeared, someone who was kind to her, who made her feel seen in small ways, and her brain took all that existing stress and said "this must be him."
It wasn't him. It was never going to be him.
But try telling that to a brain that has already decided.
The thing about one-sided love that nobody talks about honestly is how it distorts your perception of the other person. You don't fall in love with them. You fall in love with the version of them you've constructed in your own mind, built from fragments of real interactions and enormous amounts of projection.
Tariq was probably a decent person. Kind enough. Reasonably smart. But Fatima had turned him into something else entirely in her head. Every small gesture became profound. Every neutral expression became meaningful. She read depth into his silences, saw vulnerability in his awkwardness, imagined a rich inner life that matched the one she'd assigned him.
The real Tariq was just a guy. Ordinary. Going about his life. Thinking about his own problems, his own crushes, his own complicated relationship with his father that had nothing to do with Fatima.
But she couldn't see the real Tariq because the version in her head was louder.
Psychologist John Bowlby spent decades studying attachment and discovered something that explains why unrequited feelings tend to intensify rather than fade over time. Humans bond most intensely with figures who are inconsistently available,the irony of it. When someone responds to you sometimes but not others, when their attention comes in unpredictable bursts, your brain interprets that inconsistency as significance rather than indifference.
Tariq was inconsistent with Fatima only because he wasn't thinking about her at all. Some days he'd greet her warmly because he was in a good mood. Other days he'd walk past without acknowledging her because he was distracted. To Fatima, these fluctuations felt like a pattern with meaning behind it, like if she could just decode his behavior she'd understand what he really felt.
There was nothing to decode. There was no hidden meaning in his inconsistency. He was just a person whose attention had nothing to do with her.
But limerence doesn't care about logic. It feeds on uncertainty, grows stronger with every unanswered question, gets more consuming with every ambiguous interaction. The more you don't know, the more your brain fills the gaps with hope, and hope is the most addictive substance your nervous system can produce.
Fatima eventually told a friend what she was feeling, not about Tariq specifically, but about the pattern. About how she'd spent months building an elaborate emotional world around someone who had no idea she existed in any meaningful way. About how exhausting it was to maintain this silent, one-sided devotion to someone who would never know.
Her friend asked her a simple question: "What do you actually know about him? Not what you imagine. What do you actually know?"
Fatima sat with that question for a long time.
What she actually knew about Tariq: his name. His year in school. The colour of his favourite jacket. That he laughed easily and had a quiet voice and sometimes wore his cap on corporate to campus.
What she'd invented about Tariq: his depth. His sensitivity. The way he supposedly felt when they were in the same room. The future they might have. The reasons behind every expression that crossed his face.
The ratio of reality to fantasy was devastating when she actually examined it.
Realistically,the image you have of someone you're in love with is not an image of them. It's an image of yourself in love. Your brain creates a painting of this person using colours that come entirely from your own emotional state, and then you mistake the painting for the person.
Some people really are stars among satellites. Some people genuinely shine brighter, genuinely possess qualities that make them extraordinary. But even those people aren't extraordinary because of the specific magic you've attributed to them. They're just people whose qualities happen to activate your reward system more intensely than others.
And there are other stars. Billions of them. Other people who could activate that same reward system if the timing were right and your chemistry were ready. You just can't see them because you're staring so intently at one particular light that your eyes have adjusted to nothing else.
Fatima stopped writing in the notebook sometime in February. Not because she made a conscious decision to stop loving Tariq. But because she finally started seeing him clearly, without the filter her brain had spent months constructing.
She saw him talk to another girl one afternoon with the same easy warmth she'd been interpreting as something secret and significant when he directed it at her. She watched him laugh at something that had nothing to do with her, and for the first time, the laugh didn't feel like it belonged to some imagined shared world between them. It was just a laugh. He was just a person.
The spell didn't break dramatically. It dissolved slowly, the way fog lifts in the morning, until one day she realized she could look at him and feel nothing more than the ordinary recognition you feel when you see someone you once shared a classroom with.
You're allowed to love deeply. You're allowed to feel things so intensely they frighten you. Love is supposed to be enormous, supposed to rearrange your priorities and make you see the world differently.
But when it's one-sided, when you're pouring everything into someone who isn't pouring anything back, the love isn't sustaining you. It's consuming you. It's eating away at your peace, your self-worth, your ability to see yourself as complete without their attention.
And at some point, you have to choose yourself.
There’llalways be other stars. You'll find them when you finally stop squinting at the one that doesn't see you.


Great piece. An incredibly great piece. Thank you very much.
To add, however, I think there's a depth beyond this fog lifting—and it doesn't dissolve, even when you see clearly. I'm talking about when the spell breaks and you still choose them. And it usually isn't even things to be because they're extraordinary, but because the ordinariness itself becomes sacred. You see their flaws, their repetitions, the unglamorous mechanics of who they are, and you love them anyway. You love them regardless. Not less—differently. This is what marriages wade into.
The infatuation fades, yes, but something sturdier can take root if you let it. And when you look at it closely, you realize it's not passion that sustains it. It's often more a thing of decision. The choice to keep building with someone even after the mystery is gone. Sometimes that fades too. Sometimes you realize you were only ever in love with the idea, and when clarity comes, there's nothing left to anchor to. But other times, you find that loving someone ordinary, consistently, with eyes wide open, is its own kind of spell. Quieter. Harder. More real. Both are inescapable—whether you stay or leave, you're making peace with the fact that no one is that special, and that includes you.
This is such a beautiful read.
I love love how to brought psychology into explaining one-sided love and infatuation.
This is a piece I'd read over and over again and still learn something new.